I started my career working for the NAACP and later for the ACLU, not exactly everyone’s favorite organizations. I spent most of my career working for an agency that received funding from a generally hostile federal government. While I like any reasonable person am concerned about terrorism, or more specifically terroristic acts of violence in an otherwise civil society, I cannot believe and will not believe that safety must always involve the abandonment of civil rights and civil liberties. The I-Phone at the center of this dispute was purchased by a government agency and provided to a government employee. If I blame anyone for this predicament, it is San Bernardino County for not having a well-written and clearly followed policy concerning personal use of government provided electronic devices.

I am not convinced that any helpful information will be found on the phone. I am more concerned that there are many, many, many cell phones in the custody of law enforcement entities who want to see what’s on the device. So no, a federal court judge should not be able to direct a corporation to create a product to subvert the security devices of telecommunications device. A functional Congress on the other hand, needs to figure this one out, that is their job.


Veteran Cat Servant

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store